scales of justice, city chaos, destruction, fire, smoke, silhouette, justice symbol, urban unrest, cityscape, turmoil, law, order, balance, legal system, conflict, Delhi riots murder, Delhi riots murder 2020, ankit sharma, ankit sharma's murder,"In the Balance of Justice and Chaos" - Amidst a city torn by unrest, the steadfast symbol of justice stands resolute, a beacon of order in the face of turmoil.

Murder of Ankit Sharmas

In February 2020, the Delhi Riots unfolded as a grim chapter in India’s capital, setting a stage of chaos and violence. Amidst this turmoil, the murder of Ankit Sharma emerged as a pivotal event, capturing the nation’s attention. This essay delves into the heart of the riots to explore the circumstances leading to Sharma’s tragic death. We aim to shed light on the complex interplay of social, political, and communal forces at play during the riots. Furthermore, we will examine how “Delhi riots murder 2020” not only symbolizes a moment of acute crisis but also reflects deeper societal fractures within the fabric of contemporary Indian society. Transitioning smoothly from a broad overview of the riots, we will narrow our focus to the specifics of Sharma’s murder, revealing the layers of conflict and the quest for justice in the aftermath of the violence.

Background of the Delhi Riots Leading to Murder

The Delhi Riots of 2020, a significant event in recent Indian history, did not happen in isolation. They erupted against the backdrop of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) passed by the Indian Parliament in December 2019. This legislation aimed to fast-track citizenship for persecuted minorities from neighboring countries but notably excluded Muslims. This exclusion raised alarms and sparked widespread protests across the nation, laying the groundwork for the unrest that followed.

The Stirring of Nationwide Protests

Initially, the protests against the CAA were peaceful, aimed at safeguarding India’s secular ethos. Citizens from all walks of life, students, activists, and ordinary people, united in opposition. However, the situation rapidly escalated. The peaceful demonstrations soon gave way to more turbulent actions, highlighting deep-seated tensions within the fabric of Indian society.

The intensity of these protests was a clear indicator of the simmering discontent among various community groups. The participation broadened, reflecting a collective apprehension towards what was perceived as a move against the secular and inclusive identity of the nation. The key phrase “Delhi riots murder 2020” captures this transition from peaceful protests to violent unrest, marking a pivotal moment in the country’s socio-political landscape.

Escalation into Riots

The escalation was not sudden but a result of mounting tensions. As protests spread and intensified, so did the response from authorities, leading to clashes. The atmosphere was charged with a mix of fear, anger, and defiance, setting the stage for the eventual outbreak of the Delhi Riots in late February 2020.

The riots symbolized a boiling point, a clash not just of ideologies but of communal identities, fueled by misinformation, political rhetoric, and deep-rooted prejudices. The use of “Delhi riots murder 2020” in discussions and analyses reflects the gravity and impact of these events, underscoring the tragic loss of lives, including that of Ankit Sharma, and the enduring scars left on the national consciousness.


The Delhi Riots of 2020 stand as a stark reminder of the fragility of peace in a diverse society. The passage of the CAA and the resultant nationwide protests served as a catalyst for the violence that unfolded. Understanding this context is crucial to grasping the full scope of the events leading up to the tragic murder of Ankit Sharma and the broader implications for India’s democratic and secular framework.

The Atmosphere Leading Up to the Murder

As the Delhi riots of 2020 intensified, the air in India’s capital thickened with tension and foreboding. Protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) had escalated, evolving from peaceful demonstrations to scenes of marked unrest. This period set the stage for the tragic murder of Ankit Sharma, against a backdrop of growing chaos.

Escalating Tensions

In the weeks leading up to Sharma’s murder, key incidents acted as harbingers of the violence to come. Universities, public squares, and streets became arenas of confrontation. Activists, students, and citizens found themselves increasingly polarized, with digital platforms amplifying voices on both ends of the spectrum. The phrase “Delhi riots murder 2020” began to echo across social media, signaling the severity of the situation.

Precursors to Violence

The city buzzed with an uneasy anticipation. Minor clashes seeded fear among residents, hinting at the potential for greater conflict. Reports of inflammatory speeches and the mobilization of groups through social media contributed to a combustible mix of anger and fear. The atmosphere was ripe for an explosion, with each confrontation escalating the stakes.

The Role of Key Actors

Amidst this chaos, certain figures stood out, their actions becoming focal points for both sides of the conflict. While it’s crucial to approach the discussion of these individuals with sensitivity, their involvement underscored the deeply entrenched divisions within the city. The key phrase “Delhi riots murder 2020” encapsulates this period of escalating violence, marked by the actions of these key actors.

The Night of the Murder

As the tensions reached their zenith, the murder of Ankit Sharma emerged as a stark manifestation of the riot’s brutality. The charged atmosphere and the city’s heightened tensions provided a grim context for this tragedy. The loss of Sharma, a young intelligence officer, marked a turning point in the Delhi riots, underscoring the human cost of the conflict.


The lead-up to Ankit Sharma’s murder paints a picture of a city on the brink. The sequence of events that culminated in his death reflects not just the immediate tensions but also the broader societal divisions. “Delhi riots murder 2020” serves as a somber reminder of the days leading up to one of the most tragic events of the riots, urging us to reflect on the causes and consequences of such unrest.

The Murder of Ankit Sharma

The tragic demise of Ankit Sharma during the Delhi riots of 2020 marks a critical point in the unfolding of the events. As an intelligence officer, Sharma found himself amidst the chaos that had overtaken parts of the city. Reports suggest a brutal attack led to his untimely death, a moment that deeply resonated across communities and sparked widespread outrage.

Circumstances Leading to the Tragedy

On a fateful day in late February, amidst the escalating tensions, Sharma reportedly went missing. His family’s search ended in grief when authorities discovered his body in a drain in northeast Delhi, an area that had become a flashpoint of the riots. The brutality inflicted upon Sharma highlighted the severe nature of the violence that had engulfed the city.

Understanding the Perpetrators and Motives

Initial investigations pointed towards a targeted attack against Sharma, suggesting that the perpetrators might have known his identity as a government official. The motives behind such a heinous act remain under scrutiny, with some attributing it to the charged atmosphere and the rioters’ intent to instill fear among officials and the general populace.

The Aftermath and Call for Justice

The murder of Ankit Sharma brought a renewed focus on the law enforcement response to the riots and the urgency of restoring peace. His family, along with the larger community, demanded justice, calling for a thorough investigation into the circumstances of his death. This tragic event underscored the need for a concerted effort to address the underlying issues fueling the unrest.

Transitioning to Investigation and Aftermath

As we delve deeper into the investigation that followed Sharma’s murder, it becomes apparent that this incident was not an isolated tragedy but a reflection of the broader chaos that had taken hold of Delhi. The pursuit of justice for Sharma and other victims became a rallying point for those seeking to understand and address the complex web of tensions that led to the riots.

Cruelty and Desecration: Reflecting on the Broader Violence

The Delhi riots of 2020 unveiled scenes of unprecedented brutality, with the desecration of mortal remains marking a grim testament to the severity of the unrest. This violence did not just claim lives; it assaulted the dignity of the deceased and inflicted deep psychological wounds on the community.

The Brutality Unleashed on Ankit Sharma

Amidst the chaos, reports emerged of rioters targeting individuals with merciless violence. Instances where victims were attacked, often beyond recognition, highlighted a disturbing level of cruelty. This wanton violence served not only as a means of inflicting harm but also as a weapon of terror, aimed at instilling fear among communities.

Desecration of Mortal Remains of Ankit Sharma

The desecration of mortal remains emerged as one of the most harrowing aspects of the riots. Such acts were not mere outcomes of the violence but deliberate messages of intimidation from the perpetrators. The disrespect shown to the dead—leaving bodies in public spaces, sometimes mutilated—shocked the city’s conscience. It underscored the breakdown of societal norms and the erosion of communal respect amidst the turmoil.

Impact of Delhi riots murder on Communities

The impact of this brutality and desecration on the communities involved was profound. Families grieving the loss of their loved ones faced the added trauma of dealing with the desecration of their bodies. This cruelty shattered the communal harmony that had existed, breeding mistrust and fear among different groups. The “Delhi riots murder 2020” not only became a phrase that encapsulated the loss of life but also the loss of dignity and peace.

The Need for Reflection and Reconciliation

Reflecting on this violence urges a critical examination of the underlying tensions that led to such acts of cruelty. It calls for a collective effort towards reconciliation, emphasizing the need to address grievances, heal divisions, and restore dignity to the victims and their families. The path to recovery necessitates acknowledging the severity of the unrest and its impacts, striving to ensure that such acts of desecration and brutality do not recur.

Transitioning from the narrative of Ankit Sharma’s murder to the broader violence of the riots, including the cruelty and desecration of mortal remains, provides a comprehensive understanding of the unrest’s impact. It lays the groundwork for exploring the aftermath, investigation, and the community’s journey towards healing.

Public and Government Response to Murder of Ankit Sharma

This section evaluates how both the government and the public reacted to Ankit Sharma’s murder amidst the Delhi riots. The government’s efforts to manage the situation and the public’s response, including protests and demands for justice, highlight the complex dynamics of governance and civil society in crisis situations.

Government Actions: Initially, the government’s response involved deploying additional police forces to quell the riots and investigate the crimes, including Sharma’s murder. The establishment of inquiry commissions and promises of compensation to victims’ families were steps taken to address the immediate aftermath.

Public Sentiment: The public reaction was a mixture of grief, anger, and demand for accountability. Vigils and protests demanding justice for Ankit Sharma and other victims became common. Social media played a crucial role in mobilizing support and spreading awareness about the incidents.

Evaluating the Response: The effectiveness of the government’s measures received mixed reviews. Some appreciated the swift action in certain areas, while others criticized the delayed response and lack of preparedness for such a large-scale riot. The public’s push for justice continued, highlighting a widespread desire for peace and reconciliation.

Transition: The community’s response to the tragedy and the government’s actions set the stage for understanding the broader implications of the riots and the collective call for justice and healing.

Aftermath of Delhi riots murder of Ankit Sharma

Following the turmoil of the Delhi riots and the murder of Ankit Sharma, the aftermath was a period of reflection, mourning, and a strong call for justice. This phase was crucial for the community’s healing process and the restoration of faith in the legal and social order.

Community Mourning: The loss of Ankit Sharma brought the community together in grief. Memorials and prayer meetings were held in his honor, reflecting the collective mourning and the community’s solidarity in the face of tragedy.

Demand for Justice: The call for justice became louder, with the public and various organizations demanding swift legal action against those responsible for Sharma’s murder and the wider violence. The case became emblematic of the need for accountability and the protection of civil rights.

Steps Towards Reconciliation: Efforts to reconcile the divided communities included peace marches, interfaith dialogues, and community-led initiatives aimed at rebuilding trust. These steps, although challenging, were essential in addressing the underlying tensions and preventing future violence.

Evaluating Legal Action: The investigation into Sharma’s murder and the riot cases progressed, with several arrests made. However, the pace of legal proceedings and the outcomes remained a point of contention for many, underscoring the complexities of achieving justice in such deeply polarized contexts.

Transition: The aftermath of the riots and the pursuit of justice for Ankit Sharma shed light on the broader challenges facing society. It underscores the importance of addressing grievances, fostering dialogue, and working towards a more inclusive and just community.

Reflections on the Impact of the Delhi Riots

The Delhi Riots of 2020, underscored by the tragic murder of Ankit Sharma, have left an indelible mark on the societal, governmental, and communal landscapes of India. These events have prompted a reevaluation of how unrest is addressed, shining a light on the critical need for strategic planning and execution in both immediate responses and long-term strategies.

Societal Impact

The violence witnessed during the riots, particularly the heinous acts against individuals like Sharma, has stirred a profound societal introspection. Communities across the nation have begun to question the underlying causes of such deep-seated divisions and the ways in which societal structures might either perpetuate or heal these rifts. The collective mourning and the subsequent calls for justice have fostered a renewed emphasis on community solidarity and the importance of building bridges across divides.

Governmental Approach

In the wake of the riots, governmental entities have had to confront their approaches to managing and preventing such crises. The immediate response to the violence, coupled with the investigation and prosecution of those responsible, has been scrutinized for its effectiveness and fairness. This scrutiny has led to discussions on the necessity for more robust policies that not only address the symptoms of unrest but also tackle its root causes, including social inequality and communal tensions.

Communal Approaches

The communal violence has also prompted a reexamination of inter-community relationships. Initiatives aimed at reconciliation and peace-building have gained momentum, highlighting the critical role that dialogue and understanding play in healing the wounds inflicted by the riots. These efforts underscore the importance of communal harmony in preventing future unrest and fostering a more inclusive society.

Broader Implications for Future Protests and Government Responses

Reflecting on the strategic planning and execution during and after the Delhi Riots, it becomes evident that a multifaceted approach is essential for managing societal unrest. The lessons learned from these events stress the importance of preparedness, swift action, and the need for policies that address both immediate crises and their underlying causes. Future protests and governmental responses will likely be informed by these reflections, emphasizing the need for strategies that prioritize peace, justice, and community engagement.


Reflecting on the Tragedy

The Delhi Riots of 2020, marked by the tragic murder of Ankit Sharma, have cast a long shadow over India’s capital. This essay has navigated through the tumultuous events leading to the riots, the atmosphere of tension and violence, and the profound impact on the community, government responses, and the calls for justice that followed.

The Key Phrase as a Call to Action

“Delhi riots murder 2020” has not only become a key phrase encapsulating a period of significant unrest but also a call to action for a society in search of healing and reconciliation.

Societal and Governmental Lessons

Reflecting on the violence and the loss of life, including the brutal murder of Ankit Sharma, it becomes evident that the riots were not just a result of immediate provocations but also of deeper societal fractures. The public and government’s response to the crisis has underscored the urgent need for strategies that address both the symptoms and root causes of such conflicts.

The Path Forward

As we move forward, it is crucial to contemplate the path ahead. Preventing tragedies like the Delhi Riots and the murder of Ankit Sharma requires a collective commitment to justice, empathy, and dialogue. It calls for policies that not only address immediate concerns but also work towards resolving underlying tensions.

Commitment to a Peaceful Future

In conclusion, “Delhi riots murder 2020” serves as a somber reminder of the costs of division and the importance of unity. As we reflect on these events, let us commit to a future where such tragedies are a thing of the past, and peace and justice prevail.

Feature Image: This image features a silhouette of a figure standing in front of the Scales of Justice, which are centrally positioned and illuminated by a beam of light from above. The backdrop portrays a city in turmoil, with buildings partially enshrouded by haze or smoke on the right, while the left side shows buildings in ruin and ablaze, suggesting recent destruction. The contrast between the two sides of the scale and the city’s state implies a narrative of justice amidst chaos. (·E-2024-02-29-06.58.25_Scales_Justice_backdrop_turmoil.webp)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *