Selective judgement of Waqf act: Socio-judicial bias?
The judiciary was expected to be an impartial guardian amidst the Waqf Act unrest—but the response revealed otherwise. While petitions by Islamic bodies received swift hearings, those filed by Hindus were delayed or dismissed. This selective judgement of Waqf points to a deeper crisis in India’s constitutional commitment. Justice now appears filtered through political and religious lenses.
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed